A constitution plays a vital role in a state because it
A) Protects the territorial integrity of the country.
B) Defines the approach of a state towards other countries.
C) Keeps the interests of its citizens, both within and outside the country.
D) Sets the limits and boundaries of the governments’ interaction and powers
Correct Answer D) sets the limits and boundaries of the governments’ interaction and powers.
Explanation: A constitution serves as a fundamental legal document that establishes the framework for governance within a state. One of its primary functions is to set the limits and boundaries of governmental powers, ensuring that no single entity or individual can wield unchecked authority. By defining the powers and responsibilities of various branches of government, such as the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, a constitution helps maintain the balance of power and prevent the abuse of authority. Additionally, a constitution may include provisions for protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens, ensuring accountability, and promoting the rule of law. Therefore, option D is the correct answer as it highlights the foundational role of a constitution in regulating governmental interactions and powers.
According to Quaid-e-Azam’s speech at the Constituent Assembly in 1947, the problems that MAJORLY delayed both the Hindus and Muslims in achieving independence were
A) Jobbery and corruption.
B) B regionalism and casteism.
C) Favouritism and selfishness.
D) Sectarianism and class system.
Correct Answer B) Regionalism and casteism.
Explanation: In Quaid-e-Azam’s speech at the Constituent Assembly in 1947, he highlighted the major challenges faced by both Hindus and Muslims in achieving independence. Regionalism and casteism were among the primary obstacles that delayed the progress towards independence. These issues caused divisions within society based on regional affiliations and caste identities, leading to conflicts and hindering the unity necessary for achieving common goals. Therefore, option B, regionalism and casteism, best reflects the concerns expressed by Quaid-e-Azam in his speech.
According to Quaid-e-Azam’s speech at the Constituent Assembly in 1947, the action that
Would MOST likely devoid a society of capable people isA)
A) Black-marketing
B) Nepotism
C) Hoarding
D) Casteism
Correct Answer B) Nepotism.
Explanation: In Quaid-e-Azam’s speech at the Constituent Assembly in 1947, he emphasized the importance of eliminating practices that could deprive society of capable individuals. Nepotism refers to the favoritism shown to relatives or close associates, often in the distribution of jobs or opportunities. By favoring individuals based on family connections rather than merit, nepotism can prevent capable and deserving people from contributing to society’s progress. Therefore, according to Quaid-e-Azam’s perspective, nepotism would most likely lead to the deprivation of capable individuals within society.
According to the Objectives Resolution 1949, sovereignty belongs to the
A) Divine being.
B) Legislative bodies.
C) Selected representatives.
D) President of the country.
Correct Answer A) Divine being.
Explanation: According to the Objectives Resolution of 1949, sovereignty ultimately belongs to a divine being, emphasizing the religious and spiritual foundations of Pakistan’s governance. This resolution aimed to guide the future constitution of Pakistan and affirmed the country’s commitment to Islam as its guiding principle. Therefore, sovereignty in Pakistan is recognized as emanating from a divine source, rather than from any human authority such as legislative bodies, elected representatives, or the president.
According to the Objectives Resolution 1949, the type of government favourable for the Country, Pakistan is
A) Oligarchy
B) Theocracy
C) Democracy
D) Aristocracy
Correct Answer C) Democracy.
Explanation: According to the Objectives Resolution of 1949, the type of government favorable for Pakistan is democracy. This resolution emphasized democracy as the ideal form of governance for the country, where the people have a say in decision-making through their elected representatives. While the resolution also highlighted the importance of Islamic principles in guiding the state’s affairs, it did not advocate for a theocracy where religious leaders hold political power. Instead, it aimed to establish a democratic system that respects the principles of equality, justice, and freedom within an Islamic framework.
